What is “in the best interests of the child” by Noa Kinstler (attorney)

What is “in the best interest of the child”?

Prior to the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 the concept of “the best interest of the child” was not defined in legislation. The concept was developed through case law but did not have an outright agreed upon definition.
The Children’s Act was enacted, amongst other reasons, in order to give effect to certain rights of children as contained in our constitution.
Section 7 of the Act sets out the “best interests of child” standard.
In order to ascertain what is the best interests of the child the following factors must be taken into consideration where relevant, namely-
(a) the nature of the personal relationship between-
(i)     the child and the parents, or any specific parent; and
(ii)     the child and any other care-giver or person relevant in those circumstances;
(b)      the attitude of the parents, or any specific parent, towards-
(i)     the child; and
(ii)     the exercise of parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the child;
(c) the capacity of the parents, or any specific parent, or of any other care-giver or person, to provide for the needs of the child, including emotional and intellectual needs;
(d) the likely effect on the child of any change in the child’s circumstances, including the likely effect on the child of any separation from-
(i) both or either of the parents; or
(ii) any brother or sister or other child, or any other care-giver or person, with whom the child has been living;
(e) the practical difficulty and expense of a child having contact with the parents, or any specific parent, and whether that difficulty or expense will substantially affect the child’s right to maintain personal relations and direct contact with the parents, or any specific parent, on a regular basis;
(f) the need for the child-
(i) to remain in the care of his or her parent, family and extended family; and
(ii) to maintain a connection with his or her family, extended family, culture or tradition;
(g) the child’s-
(i) age, maturity and stage of development;
(ii) gender;
(iii)      background; and
(iv) any other relevant characteristics of the child;
(h) the child’s physical and emotional security and his or her intellectual, emotional, social and cultural development;
(i) any disability that a child may have;
(j) any chronic illness from which a child may suffer;
(k) the need for a child to be brought up within a stable family environment and, where this is not possible, in an environment resembling as closely as possible a caring family environment;
(l) the need to protect the child from any physical or psychological harm that may be caused by-
(i) subjecting the child to maltreatment, abuse, neglect, exploitation or degradation or exposing the child to violence or exploitation or other harmful behaviour; or
(ii) exposing the child to maltreatment, abuse, degradation, ill-treatment, violence or harmful behaviour towards another person;
(m) any family violence involving the child or a family member of the child; and
(n) which action or decision would avoid or minimise further legal or administrative proceedings in relation to the child.


  1. Nicole

    I totally agree with the above IF THE PARENT that the child is not living with, supports the parent who is housing the child, feeding the child and emotionally developing the child, makes contact with the child on agreed visitaions….


    Why does a parent who does not want to see the child, pay maintenance for the child or ever ask about the well being about the child, get the same rights as a parent who, supports the child finacially, emotionally and physically. The child doesnt even know the other parent, yet the LAW states this and that…

    What about the exception to the rule????

  2. Nandipha

    Am going through a divorce and the father of my kids do no want to pay maintenance for the kids..the kids are staying with me..even when he need to come see the kids, he will have excuses. And my older kid who is 8 years is no longer coping at school he is just rebellious. I’ve taken him to counselling but no help.

Leave a Comment